I was forwarded a recent thread from Reef Central where by moderators & forum members went on another of their misinformation binges.
Aquarium & Pond UV Sterilizer Review; Vecton, Advantage
In this binge, a Reef Central member made one of the more laughable misinformation statements I have ever read online.
QUOTE: “While AquaUV is not the cheapest UV on the market, like the link you provided say, they are quality units with great dwell time. What they fail to mention is their great support. Same can be said about Emperor Aquatics. Something that is non existent with Tropical Marine Centre who is over seas and depends exclusively on retailers for support.”
Sorry dude, TMC support is superior just because it is retailer based.
Let me ask readers what would rather have as a return policy using a laptop computer as an example:
You have a choice between two laptops of similar value, with one it can be brought back to the store for an exchange or parts replacement, or the other you have to send away to the manufacturer and wait several weeks to get your laptop back?
I think most would take the first quicker option; sorry dude.
Do not believe me, here’s a link to their warrant returns page:
Let me address a few more comments from this terrible thread of misinformation.
- This same character, makes more misinformation statements.
“That said, the units mentioned in your links are cheap units meant to appeal the masses. Not necessarily quality units and they don’t have the same kind of dwell time as the higher end units from AquaUV or Emperor.”
While admittedly the Aqua Ultraviolet and Emperor are excellent (I have used these too), the TMC is NOT a cheap unit meant to appeal to the masses, a quick peak on eBay or Amazon will find plenty of these cheap units often for under $50 such as the AquaTop, Killing Machine, and many others. These are cheap.
The facts are the dwell time is the highest of any UV with the TMC Vecton, in fact higher than some of Emperors Smart UVs which use very short lamps and short exposure times.
Has this guy even done a dwell time test?
Has he even done his homework, such as reading the article he so conveniently bashes out of hand with ad hominem attacks on the author by him and others?
Here is an excellent video showing how the AAP/TMC large aquarium or pond UV is superior over the still excellent Aqua Ultraviolet UV of the same category [due to longer dwell time, price, and parts availability]:
Aqua Pond UV vs TMC AAP Pond UV Clarifier Sterilizer
- Here is another of this guys statements:
“Here is the Tropical Marine Centre UV unit that I used to run on my tank. At the time, it was one of the only higher wattage units out there that used a crystal sleeve. These units are now relegated to Tropical Marine Centre’s commercial product line and not readily available in the states. The AquaUV’s equivalent (Classic Series) is better made, easier to service and backed by much better support. The comparable AquaUV is also much cheaper.”
Does this guy do ANY HOMEWORK AT ALL? If so he gets an F.
The TMC 110 UV is readily available in the USA for under $400 in some locations or websites.
Since my commitment to readers of my website blog post is to not commercialize my results by posting links to resellers, I will simply state these are not difficult to find online.
As for support, I have already addressed this falsehood, but will add that I have NEVER had an issue with parts or returns for ANY TMC product from lights, FSB filters, or their UV Sterilizers. This includes one rare instance of a hairline crack in the body for which I was given a brand new UV sterilizer, NO SHIPPING BACK FOR REPAIRS!!
- This one is from a Reef Central Moderator:
But does sell them, and is trying awfully hard to the make them out to the be best thing since sliced bread. While they can indeed be useful in some circumstances, they are not the wonder equipment with all the attributes he gives them.”
This comment is not so bad IMO, since he is simply stating an opinion as an opinion.
However I have read this article quoted and do not get the same thing at all out of the article or other articles published by the author.
He clearly recommends “True” UV Sterilizers as he calls them as a useful tool, which includes other tools such as quarantine.
As well we have another case of someone who appears to not research outside of Reef Central or even read an article in question or its cited references, otherwise he would never make such statements of “opinion”.
- “Even so, the UV will have some impact on pods as well despite the high flow rates.”
What are the “pods” doing in the water column?
Has he heard of pre-filtration which is an essential ingredient for correct UV Sterilizer application?
Sorry one again; WRONG!!
- “Keep in mind, that article is written by a guy selling UV units.”
A typical liberal ad hominem argument whereby you attack the person rather than the facts or cited resources.
This has no bearing on the credibility of the article assuming the facts and references are sound.
Using his own terminology: Keep in mind, that there is always a money trail anywhere, some are just less obvious or down right sneaky.
Does this guy work for free, does he not expect the author to sell what he found to be a superior product?
Back to following the money, Reef Central is supported by sponsorships; have you ever noticed that a member will get the “ban hammer” for speaking negatively against EcoTech, one of Reef Central’s major supporters?
I would say in the end, use common sense logic, actually do your homework, not give lip service like these members of Reef Central do.
Also do not depend upon Google for good search results when doing your research, since they too are beholden to deliver readers to their pals such as Amazon or others. Consider DuckDuckGo who does not spy on you and use your information to track your habits!